About SmartPlanly

Strategy becomes useful when the reasoning is clear.

We organize company research through established business frameworks, so a broad question becomes an analysis you can inspect, challenge and adapt.

ONE COMPANYSix connected perspectives.

Competition · Environment · Portfolio · Model · Marketing · Position

Porter’s Five ForcesPESTLE AnalysisBCG MatrixBusiness Model CanvasMarketing MixSWOT Analysis

Move from scattered facts to a decision-ready structure.

Strategy work often begins with an empty page, disconnected sources and a framework that is easy to name but difficult to apply. SmartPlanly gives that work a practical starting point.

Each resource connects company-specific information to a clear analytical lens. The goal is to show how the evidence relates to the conclusion, while leaving room for the reader to test assumptions and add current information.

What we publish

Two formats. One standard of clarity.

Company research

Structured analysis that explains a company, its market setting and the strategic mechanisms behind the headline.

Editable resources

Word and Excel files that help readers organize, discuss and continue their own strategy work.

Six frameworks

Porter’s Five Forces, SWOT, PESTLE, BCG Matrix, Business Model Canvas and Marketing Mix.

The conclusion must be easier to audit than the layout is to admire.

Every page should define its question, distinguish evidence from judgment and state the limits that could change the conclusion.

  1. Define the scope

    Name the company, market, period and strategic question.

  2. Organize the evidence

    Match sources and observations to the framework they support.

  3. Make the reasoning visible

    Explain the mechanism behind each assessment and keep uncertainty explicit.

  4. Review and maintain

    Check clarity, consistency and material updates before publication.

Oleksii Ryzhkov
Editorial responsibility

Oleksii Ryzhkov

Author and editorial lead

Oleksii defines the research question, reviews the evidence trail, challenges the analysis and takes responsibility for the final editorial judgment.

Primary sources first

Material claims should lead to evidence that matches the right entity, period and unit.

Human-reviewed conclusions

Tools may support organization and editing; editorial judgment remains with a named person.

Independent perspective

Company coverage does not imply affiliation, endorsement or a favorable conclusion.

Start with the company

Choose the question that matters.

Search the library and compare six strategic perspectives in one place.

Search the library